🔗 Share this article

The Norwegian football team has demanded strengthened substance testing policies after a remarkable incident in which an athlete from their female squad ingested an illegal stimulant originating from rubber crumb in a synthetic pitch.

Landmark Ruling Exposes External Risks

An extensive process concluded recently when Wada chose not to appeal the conclusion of Adno that the individual was not at fault. However this groundbreaking ruling has highlighted the hazards to players of external contact to illegal materials and raised the chance of additional problems emerging around the numerous man-made pitches across Europe.

The Match and Surprising Discovery

The thought of a positive test had not been on anyone’s minds when the club met LSK Kvinner at the venue in the location, close to Oslo, this spring. However a routine drug test found four players from both teams had returned samples with the prohibited substance DMBA. One of the samples, submitted by the Vålerenga player, was above the Wada reporting threshold of the set limit.

Inquiry and Discovery

This led to an investigation that confused officials from each side and the testing agency, which found no shared factors in meals, liquids or additional products used by the individuals affected. The athlete, who has decided to be unidentified, shared the stress brought on by discovering she was charged with a positive test. “It was an awful moment,” she said. “It was a very upsetting situation and I was confused about what happened.”

She was permitted to continue her career while the inquiry proceeded. She feels the stress it caused may have affected some of her performances and was extremely happy when an external inquiry, which ended during the summer, finally discovered the unexpected origin.

Cause Found

The investigation found, following analysis water samples and substances from different areas at the stadium, that the shredded tyre granulate – commonly called tyre granules – on the pitch had harboured the stimulant, which had been passed on to the individuals during the game. DMBA is an artificial substance that stimulates neurological functions and is occasionally found in dietary supplements, even though it is prohibited in the country and the European Union. Research showed, through peer-reviewed scientific studies, to be a compound that might be produced from the decomposition of the tyre material and this has caused a certain level of annoyance that this was not picked up on throughout the inquiry.

No Fault Determined

The athlete was determined to have no responsibility in the initial instance in top-level competition where surrounding factors has been causing a perceived violation. “I was always sure I was innocent and I thank the authorities for finding the origin to LSK-Hallen,” she said.

“However, the process and outcome seem a bit random. Had officials failed to pinpoint the infill as the origin, my position would have been significantly harder. If you are very cautious, adhere to regulations and nonetheless become facing such a situation, it shows how vulnerable you are in competition.”

Future Concerns

The surfaces are not considered to pose a health risk to individuals but issues have been expressed before about their role in environmental contamination. From 2031, synthetic material will be barred from sale in Europe. Following this incident, sports authorities recommended that indoor competitive matches be moved outdoors. Reports indicate about numerous similar artificial surfaces in the nation and they are also widespread in the United Kingdom, especially at local clubs. There is no global rule to guarantee playing surfaces are clear of materials prohibited in sport.

Urgent Adjustments

The club want the rules to be strengthened to acknowledge that a violation is not necessarily linked to the player’s conduct, intentional or not. International regulations are based on “strict liability”. Those are explained in the specific clause of the global rules, which says: “It is not necessary that purpose, fault, negligence or deliberate intake by the player be shown to determine an anti-doping violation.”

The CEO, representing the team, stated: “Surrounding elements must be carefully considered in the future. This involves developing a holistic overview of what in the environment might cause a positive result. Substance testing has to develop and issues like this have to become a more significant focus of the factors you take into consideration.”

Future Implications

There is an issue that, given that the danger of DMBA pollution through surfaces has been flagged, potentially any athlete to show a violation for this cause could not be found innocent. Officials additionally considers if the inquiry could have been as thorough if a single athlete had tested positive including the compound in that fixture.

Hope for the Future

The cleared athlete said: “It is hoped additional individuals in a situation like mine will have improved rights in the future. Regulations currently can lead to {an innocent athlete|a blameless player|a